Table dos Properties of men and women into the five ethnic teams
The results are expressed as means and standard deviations, unless stated otherwise. Between-group differences in subject characteristics were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s EuropГ¤isches Frauen aus multiple comparison procedure if a significant F test was obtained. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to adjust body composition results for comparison across ethnic groups. Before carrying out the ANCOVA, similarity of regression slopes among the ethnic groups was verified by examining the significance of the interaction between the covariate(s) and the group variable. Relationships between body composition measurements and age were investigated by multiple regression analysis controlling for independent variables such as height and weight. Potential interaction terms and non-linear relationships were examined for selected variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are presented for bivariate linear relationships with age and partial correlation coefficients where adjustment is made for weight and height. Data were analysed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results with P < 0·05>
Class and you will entire-body constitution
Body composition characteristics of the sufferers is summarised by sex and you can ethnicity during the Desk dos. Western european dudes were younger, high along with straight down FM and part of BF than simply its equivalents throughout the almost every other three groups. European women was indeed younger than just Asian Indian feminine, and you may was basically taller together with down FM and you will percentage of BF than simply the equivalents on other three groups. The newest Asian Indian dudes got leg weight and BMC but high percentage of BF versus European, Maori and Pacific guys. The brand new Western Indian female as well as met with the higher part of BF and lowest BMC of one’s four cultural teams, whenever you are their body lbs is lower than Maori and Pacific female and not notably different from the latest Western european women. Once improvement to possess age, level and you will weight, Far-eastern Indians encountered the higher FM, reasonable pounds-totally free bulk and you may reasonable BMC of your own five ethnic organizations, whenever you are Pacific had the lowest FM and you can large fat-100 % free size, both for someone, plus the large BMC for males (Table 3).
Relationships ranging from Body mass index and you will portion of extra fat
Curvilinear relationships between the percentage of BF and BMI for each ethnic group were linearised by logarithmically transforming BMI (Fig. 1)parison of regression equations of the percentage of BF on the logarithm of BMI with age as a covariate and with sex and ethnicity as group variables indicated significant heterogeneity in the slopes of the male and female equations (P < 0·0001).>
Fig. 1 Relationship between the percentage of body fat (BF) and BMI of European (?), Maori (0), Pacific Island (^) and Asian Indian (?) (a) men and (b) women. The linear regressions are: percentage of BF = 117·7 log10(BMI) ? 144·2 (standard error of estimate (SEE) = 5·2 %, r 2 0·61, n 124) for European men (-); percentage of BF = 101·3 log10(BMI) ? 122·0 (SEE = 4·6 %, r 2 0·74, n 109) for Maori men (- – -); percentage of BF = 93·6 log10(BMI) ? 113·6 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·68, n 104) for Pacific Island men (·····); percentage of BF = 78·6 log10(BMI) ? 79·4 (SEE = 5·0 %, r 2 0·52, n 117) for Asian Indian men (-·-·); percentage of BF = 103·5 log10(BMI) ? 109·7 (SEE = 4·8 %, r 2 0·72, n 186) for European women (-); percentage of BF = 74·8 log10(BMI) ? 70·3 (SEE = 3·9 %, r 2 0·72, n 90) for Maori women (—); percentage of BF = 65·2 log10(BMI) ? 57·8 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·65, n 97) for Pacific Island women (·····); percentage of BF = 71·0 log10(BMI) ? 57·7 (SEE = 4·4 %, r 2 0·60, n 107) for Asian Indian women (-·-·).
